Mailsmith header preferences free#

User preference media features consist of a name (like prefers-reduced-motion) and allowed values Inline the CSS responsible for the dark theme into the response body.

The server can then tailor the response to the client’s preferences accordingly and, for example, Has a user preference for dark-schemed content. The client then retries the request, telling the server via Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Scheme that it HTTP/1.1 200 OKĪccept-CH: Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Scheme, Sec-CH-Prefers-Contrast Varies the response on as conveyed by Vary. The server responds, telling the client via Accept-CH that it accepts the Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Scheme and the Sec-CH-Prefers-Contrast Client Hints, out of which as per Critical-CH it considers Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Scheme a Critical Client Hint that it also The client makes an initial request to the server. This specification introduces a set of headers around user preference media featuresĪs defined by. Want to avoid a flash of inaccurate color theme. Time, so that the initial HTML payload already has the right CSS inlined.Īdditionally, and specifically for prefers-color-scheme, sites by all means Scheme (or other user preference media features respectively) ideally at request That inline CSS for performance reasons need to know about the preferred color Wish to honor user preference media features like prefers-color-scheme and High-traffic sites like search engines or news sites that The user is going to have when the page loads. Have a potentially significant impact on the amount of CSS that needs to be delivered by a page, and on the experience 2.2 Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-TransparencyĬSS media queries, and specifically Media Queries 5 § 11 User Preference Media Features like prefers-color-scheme or prefers-reduced-motion,.Nordstrom’s attorney was not immediately available to comment.

The Arizona Department of Corrections said it is reviewing the ruling. Nordstrom received a death sentence in the 1996 shooting deaths of two men during a robbery at the Moon Smoke Shop, and four people during a robbery at the Tucson Firefighters' Association Union Hall.

The case now returns to Campbell to craft a decree of actual risks in Arizona state prisons. Smith suggested prison officials only scan letters for contraband and check a state bar's list of licensed attorneys to confirm the recipient. 'Moreover, there are readily available, less restrictive alternatives that are unlikely to have an adverse effect on prisons.' 'Due to the more limited threat that outgoing mail poses to prison security, and ADC’s inability to proffer evidence to show that such mail poses a threat, the ends do not justify the means,' Smith wrote. The department's policy does not meet this standard though, since it requires officials to verify that a letter's contents amounts to legal mail, Smith found. 'At most, a proper inspection entails looking at a letter to confirm that it does not include suspicious features such as maps, and making sure that illegal goods or items that pose a security threat are not hidden in the envelope,' Smith wrote for the three-judge panel. The Ninth Circuit disagreed Thursday, for the second time in three years.Ĭircuit Judge Milan Smith found that while the department has the right to allow prison guards to review outgoing mail for contraband, its definition of 'contraband' is so broad that it amounts to a 'page-by-page content review' that violated Nordstrom's First and Sixth Amendment rights. District Judge David Campbell initially dismissed Nordstrom's lawsuit for failure to state a valid claim, but a divided three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision in 2014 and remanded the case.Ĭampbell then found the department's policy did not violate Nordstrom's constitutional rights.

Mailsmith header preferences free#

(CN) – The Arizona Department of Corrections unconstitutionally allows prison guards to read mail that inmates send to their attorneys, the Ninth Circuit ruled Thursday.ĭeath-row inmate Scott Nordstrom sued Arizona Department of Corrections Director Charles Ryan in 2011, claiming his Sixth Amendment right to confidential correspondence with his counsel and his First Amendment right to free speech was violated when a prison guard read a letter Nordstrom had written to his lawyer marked as 'legal mail.”